Hard to believe some low volatility setups are appearing all over the place, but that is the market we are in. The "bull market" in stocks continues higher, seemingly unabated. Who am I to fight it?
And where else should we play but in names that continue to benefit from the "work-from-home" and social distancing mindshift that is happening on a global scale? Like Social Media.
From a Precious Metals' perspective, Palladium has been a clear leader for over a decade. Despite its strong long-term performance, a sharp March drawdown has people wondering whether this is the end of its reign over the Precious Metals' space.
In this post, we're going to outline our "keep it simple stupid" approach to answering that very question.
In this post, we'll highlight that this broadening participation and flight towards risk-assets is more than just a one-week phenomenon. We've seen this type of price behavior in some asset classes for over a month now.
Do you know when stocks making new 52-week relative lows is actually bullish? When we're talking about Consumer Staples.
You see, when the market is falling apart, you're going to see a sympathy bid, specifically on a relative basis, into Consumer Staples. In other words, no matter how bad things get, we're still going to drink beers, smoke cigarettes, brush our teeth and wash our dishes. Those things won't change. We call them Staples.
On the flip side, when stocks are doing well and the major indexes are in uptrends, or bull markets if you want to call them that, Staples are going to underperform. Their safer-haven status and lower beta components tend to lag during the good times.
In recent weeks, we've witnessed a powerful rotation as many of the secular laggards have assumed short-term leadership positions.
In today's post, we're going to take a stab at using a new visualization tool in order to illustrate this recent changing of the guard.
This scatter plot is comparing the maximum drawdown from 52-week highs to the March lows (Y-Axis) with the short-term performance off of the May 13th low, among all of the 150+ Dow Jones Industry Indexes. The plot-sizes are based on how large the current drawdown is... In other words, the bigger the dot, the bigger the drop.
Thanks to everyone for participating in this week's Mystery Chart. It was a bit of a layup, as most of you were bullish, recognizing the powerful failed breakdown and follow-through back above critical former support.
We would agree and like this chart for a counter-trend move right now as well. But the reason we chose it was really for informational purposes, as we are seeing continuation patterns resolve higher all over the globe right now.
The more of these patterns that resolve to the upside, the stronger the weight of the evidence builds in favor of other consolidations working themselves out higher as well. We are seeing this across all areas of Domestic and International Equity Markets, many of which we'll highlight in this post.
For those new to the exercise, we take a chart of interest and remove the x/y-axes and any other labels that would help identify it. The chart can be any security in any asset class on any timeframe on an absolute or relative basis. Maybe it’s a custom index or inverted, who knows!
We do all this to put aside the biases we have associated with this specific security/the market and come to a conclusion based solely on price.
You can guess what it is if you must, but the real value comes from sharing what you would do right now. Buy, Sell, or Do Nothing?
Consolidations tend to resolve in the direction of the underlying trend. But when they don't, that's the signal!
An oldie but goodie from the past, that I always think about when this comes up, is the US Treasury Bond Fund back in the Fall of 2016. I remember chatting with Liz Claman at the time about it on FOX. The $TLT was consolidating in a classic, textbook continuation pattern above former resistance from the early 2015 highs:
The bet we were making (for many other factors as well at that time) was that this was not a continuation pattern, and instead a massive failed breakout.